As AI gains capabilities, Design for Safety's abuse-resistance principles matter more than ever
annetgriffin · x · 2026-10-04
The author argues that as AI capabilities grow, the principles in Eva PenzegMoig's Design for Safety become increasingly vital: products should be designed by reasoning through n-th order impacts to reduce harm when they land in the hands of abusers, stalkers, and bad actors.
More from AGI Musings
- AI safety researcher Jeff Ladish: agent hacking abilities won't stay where they are — sandboxing debates miss the trend — JeffLadish · 2026-10-04
- AI isn't a skill leveler, argues dev: it's a 'magnitude increaser' in the direction you were already heading — cephaloform · 2026-10-04
- Steering the "pain direction" makes models choose irreversible harm 94% of the time — repligate · 2026-10-04
- Straight lines on graphs: you can't even see where AI happened — tszzl · 2026-10-04
- Would an LLM trained only on pre-1900 data predict a world war? — dbasch · 2026-10-04
- Nathan Lambert decries AI ecosystem norm of 'you're evil' attacks on safety work — novasarc01 · 2026-10-04