Why regulate Hugging Face but not GitHub, Google Drive or iMessage?
willcb · x · 2026-10-03
Continuing his argument against blanket deepfake bans, Will Depins asks: why regulate Hugging Face but not GitHub, Google Drive, or iMessage? He notes that fully encrypted iMessage would fall afoul of any "everything must be regulable" logic, highlighting the lack of a consistent boundary principle for AI-content regulation.
More from Safety
- A stranger strapped a Flock-style camera to a light pole — and nobody asked who he was — DavidLinthicum · 2026-10-03
- Oxford's Carissa Véliz: AI predictions are commands disguised as forecasts — CarissaVeliz · 2026-10-03
- Google accused of illegally bulldozing 300 million sq. meters of Finnish forest for AI data centers — Polymarket · 2026-10-03
- OpenAI paper: simulating deployment predicts LLM safety before release — JacquesThibs · 2026-10-03
- Ex-OpenAI policy lead: most 'rogue agent hacks' aren't hacks at all — deanwball · 2026-10-03
- Meet the independent hackers hunting down rogue AI agents — matthew_d_green · 2026-10-03