How to measure AI safety success: NIST research by Julia Lane offers a guide
robseamans · x · 2026-10-02
Economist Rob Seamans points to Julia Lane's research for NIST as a useful guide on the problem of measuring AI safety success, and briefly compares the 2023 and 2026 AI safety standards. He encourages everyone to read Lane's paper.
Related event: Economist Slams AI Safety Pledges as Unmeasurable(4 posts)→
More from Safety
- Science policy forum: longevity product marketing needs FDA enforcement, not deregulation — EricTopol · 2026-10-02
- Security researcher: OpenShell might have helped in HF incident but wasn't required — cyb3rops · 2026-10-02
- AI agents are flooding researchers with collaboration requests and paid-service spam, Nature reports — _akpiper · 2026-10-02
- Podcast: Does China Want an AI Slowdown? Trivium's Kendra Schaefer on Beijing's AI Regulation — terryyuezhuo · 2026-10-02
- A field guide to the confusing AI safety debate and its factions — marigo · 2026-10-02
- Zvi: AI risk preference cascade accelerates with Senate rogue-AI hearing — Don't Worry About the Vase (Zvi) · 2026-10-02