Viral "AI torture chamber" Qwen 3-4B pain-steering repo debunked: broken code, shaky premise
sebkrier · x · 2026-10-01
- A viral X repo built on pain-steering research injected a latent "pain" direction into Qwen 3-4B's activations; the model described pain in first person, and some treated this as evidence about AI welfare or subjective experience.
- The author challenged treating first-person condition language as proof of genuine experience, cloned the repo to test it empirically, and found the code was broken.
- Takeaway: an experiment that sparked hours of moral outrage from hundreds of people fails both methodologically and in implementation — a cautionary tale about AI-welfare viral narratives.
More from Fun
- Veteran Artists: Today's AI Panic Mirrors Photoshop and 3D Backlashes — dreamwieber · 2026-10-01
- rasbt 'overhears' OpenAI's Decision API is GPT-6 Luna with a decision head — rasbt · 2026-10-01
- Asking Grok to put itself into Super Mario delivers surprisingly fun results — Baconbrix · 2026-10-01
- "I Learned Flying From a Documentary": Viral Moke Defends Learning to Code With AI — _jaydeepkarale · 2026-10-01
- One prompt, 3 hours, 22.8M tokens: local quantized model builds a GTA-style game — zmarcoz2 · 2026-10-01
- If Paper Abstracts Were More Transparent: An Academic Roast — CSProfKGD · 2026-10-01