Arena benchmarks Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol: can cheap tiers match flagship results?
arena · x · 2026-10-01
- The Arena team ran a side-by-side test of Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol, asking whether these smaller models can deliver flagship-level results at a fraction of what Fable, Opus, or Astra cost.
- They tested multiple prompts, tracking what each model generation actually costs and comparing outputs against larger models from the same labs.
- Full results, compiled by @petergostev, are available on Arena's YouTube channel.
More from Models
- Rumor: Google's Gemini 4 Argon spotted ahead of launch, details still unconfirmed — koltregaskes · 2026-10-01
- Google is back: Gemini 4 Argon beats Astra and Opus 5.5 across the board — Yuchenj_UW · 2026-10-01
- Argon hits 55% on FrontierSWE v2 long-horizon coding, vs ~20% for Gemini 3.x — xennygrimmato_ · 2026-10-01
- Full benchmark results for Gemini 4 Argon with high reasoning released — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-01
- Gemini 4 Argon tops AutomationBench-AA at 77.5%, 6 points ahead of Claude Sonnet 5.5 — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-01
- GPT-6.1 Sol cached input at $0.10/M: the line that sets your agent bill — victor_explore · 2026-10-01