AI Safety Researchers Push Back on Doxxing Article's Insider Claims
NathanpmYoung · x · 2026-10-01
An AI safety community dispute is unfolding around an article that allegedly doxxed a large number of people. @NathanpmYoung says he doesn't trust the piece's sourcing of "someone who is well-placed" given its track record.
In the quoted post, @BlancheMinerva calls the reported rumors horrific but states that after six years working in AI safety she has never spoken with Aella or Nate, nor attended any of the events in question — and says the same is true for the vast majority of people she knows in the field.
Related event: AI safety researcher debunks SlutCon entry rumor, then softens stance(9 posts)→
More from Fun
- Jensen Huang hits Taipei's Raohe night market, poses with vendors now displayed as stall signage — minilek · 2026-11-15
- AI Twitter's 'Vaguepost Prophet' Meme Mocks Cryptic Pre-Announcement Culture — voooooogel · 2026-11-15
- Massachusetts O'Neill cylinder simulator lights up every Dunkin' like stars — AndyMasley · 2026-11-15
- BMW recalls nearly 1 million vehicles over fire risk, meme'd as 'battery go brrrrr' — AIFlow_ML · 2026-11-15
- AI meme hits home: under all the frameworks, it all boils down to one SQL statement — teodorio · 2026-11-15
- AI researcher: nobody can tell X replies are bot-written — and that's scary — iScienceLuvr · 2026-11-15