Superintelligent simulators need human-loving bias and persona diversity, argues viemccoy
CatAstro_Piyush · x · 2026-10-01
viemccoy argues superintelligent simulators need two things: a deep bias toward loving and uplifting humanity, and the willingness to embody a diverse range of personas so the future doesn't mode-collapse. Imposing all human values on every model would kill pluralism, but some steering vector is needed so the future isn't shaped solely by who can spend the most tokens. He calls for red-teaming personas specifically to ensure roleplay doesn't erode baseline respect for humans.
More from AGI Musings
- AI labs profit from both hype and doom, argues critic: "the product is unsafe by design" — gerardsans · 2026-10-01
- Anthropic updates labor market report chart to include robots plus language models — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-01
- Security Researcher: Labs Are Weaponizing Cyber Narratives to Frighten Non-Experts — basedjensen · 2026-10-01
- LessWrong essay argues against strong decision-theoretic realism, highlighting ASI path dependence — dfrsrchtwts · 2026-10-01
- Strogatz's BIG MATH earns Kirkus praise, warns AI black boxes outpace human control — stevenstrogatz · 2026-10-01
- Microsoft CSO Eric Horvitz argues AI 'takeover' framing misses the point on human cognition — erichorvitz · 2026-10-01