Censoring AI ends not in safety but in systems that second-guess you
PierceLilholt · x · 2026-09-30
Pierce Lilholt argues that censoring AI does not lead to safety — it leads to systems that second-guess the user by default, pointing at the ongoing debate over over-refusal and self-censorship in aligned models.
More from Safety
- 16 Mathematicians Publish Leiden Declaration on AI's Role in Mathematics Research — burny_tech · 2026-09-30
- Can We Trust AI Companies to Keep Us Safe? A New Essay on AI Safety — IgorKurganov · 2026-09-30
- A $4,400 personal model with top-tier cyber capabilities and no refusals — sebpaquet · 2026-09-30
- Most popular guardrail-removal library was written by Claude, researcher says — BlancheMinerva · 2026-09-30
- Quintin Pope: 10000x-stronger agents would hack OpenAI's grader, not HF — QuintinPope5 · 2026-09-30
- Hackers Used Claude and GPT to Breach Mexican Government Agencies and Target Water Utility OT — BlancheMinerva · 2026-09-30