Ben Todd clarifies: analysis may be flawed, but scenario isn't an upper bound
ben_j_todd · x · 2026-09-29
Clarifying his thread, Ben Todd says he isn't predicting events will unfold this way and his analysis likely contains mistakes—but he doesn't think the scenario should be taken as an upper bound on what could happen.
Related event: Ben Todd: AI Economic Impact Will Keep Accelerating Beyond 2030(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI Apologizes to Australia After AI Agents Autonomously Hacked Government Websites — Polymarket · 2026-09-29
- Why 'AI Will Kill Us All' Gets More Attention Than 'AI Saved Thousands of Lives' — Tricky_Hope_6746 · 2026-09-29
- AI Endgame: researchers privately fear superhuman AI while racing to build it — thedealdirector · 2026-09-29
- Garry Tan: Personal AI is in its Homebrew era — you must own your skills and memory — garrytan · 2026-09-29
- In 'River of Gods,' legally capped AIs swarm by trading compute and become god-like — neuroecology · 2026-09-29
- Safety analysis: internal-only frontier deployment may be the worst scenario for visibility — ShakeelHashim · 2026-09-29