Defending Aella: Her Sex Work Doesn't Undermine the AI Safety Movement
anpaure · x · 2026-09-29
Reacting to the Aella controversy, the author argues the idea that her sex work damages the AI safety movement is absurd: she's a sex worker and researcher with a genuine interest in AI safety, not an AI safety researcher whose unorthodox private life suddenly surprised everyone.
Related event: Aella's Slutcon Sparks Debate in AI Safety Circles(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- California professor teaches 30 classes across 9 colleges for $800K/year using pre-recorded lectures — alvelda · 2026-11-15
- Aaron Levie: work will become coding-shaped to fit what AI agents are good at — RaphaelDabadie · 2026-11-15
- Mapping 2,234 media stories in 15 days: a visual trace of AI coverage and documented ties — kevinnbass · 2026-11-15
- Does 'Meditations on Moloch' Imply a Friendly AI Singleton Is Our Best Bet? — jessi_cata · 2026-11-15
- Hybrid Decision Models: Only 30% of Queries Need Reasoning, Latency Cut 72.5% — hbouammar · 2026-11-15
- A barber only heard of ChatGPT last week: real-world AI adoption gap — AI_Andrew · 2026-11-15