User Slams OpenAI for Halving $200 Sub Quota While Framing It as More Efficient
kimmonismus · x · 2026-09-29
Blogger kimmonismus notes OpenAI and Anthropic have swapped places: Anthropic, once criticized for degrading subscriptions, now ships impressively efficient Opus and Sonnet models, while OpenAI is the one cutting back. He then realized his $200 Max plan had its quota halved — framed by OpenAI as "more efficient in the long run" — a blunt paid-user complaint about the pricing change.
More from Fun
- Grok 4.7 and Claude Opus 5.5 both score zero on CancerBench — iScienceLuvr · 2026-09-29
- AI safety drama: zero detected misalignment incidents from Chinese labs despite Western lab turmoil — basedjensen · 2026-09-29
- Anthropic and OpenAI ship five model releases in one month as 'pace the frontier' pact collapses — XFreeze · 2026-09-29
- Claude Code instances can now message each other in multi-agent demo — tom_doerr · 2026-09-29
- Mocking the ASI superpersuasion hype: catchy jingles and flashy production value — burny_tech · 2026-09-29
- One HTML file with Claude Opus 5.5: an interactive world that keeps running after the film ends — CurieuxExplorer · 2026-09-29