After 5 years of AI debates, almost no one admits they were wrong
dioscuri · x · 2026-09-29
Looking back at five years of AI discourse, dioscuri observes how rarely people admit they were wrong: however blatant the error, there's always a way to reinterpret the original claim until it looks defensible — and worse, they often don't realize they're doing it.
More from AGI Musings
- Brookings: AI slashes the cost of expertise and redraws the firm's boundary — rvp · 2026-09-29
- Researcher publishes timeline of emergent LLM capabilities in one write-up — gleech · 2026-09-29
- Stephen Wolfram on the future of pure math research in the age of AI — davilagrau · 2026-09-29
- AI agents as the ultimate efficient-market machine: value flows to consumers — kleffew94 · 2026-09-29
- Dario's slowdown push meets reality: 60% of US firms say AI outpaces their governance — anacondainc · 2026-09-29
- French strike over retirement age vs. an AI future where retirement vanishes by 2050s — Dr_Singularity · 2026-09-29