Researcher Kundaje: latest LLM reviews beat the garbage human reviews I've seen for years
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-09-28
Responding to @suragnair's complaints about LLM-flooded reviews, prominent computational genomics researcher Anshul Kundaje takes the opposite stance: LLM reviews with human oversight should be allowed. He argues reviews from the latest models would be far better than the poor human reviews he has seen at conferences, since reviewer expertise rarely matches the paper's topic.
More from Research
- Stanford prof backs proposal for official LLM reviews in peer review, humans just calibrate — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-29
- Three tiny MLPs on frozen Gemma 4 hit 95.8% turn-taking accuracy at near-zero cost — cortexist · 2026-09-29
- Speech-guided multimodal learning for vocal tract segmentation presented at MICCAI 2026 — maier_ak · 2026-09-29
- Pachocki, Hinton, Bengio & Jack Clark co-author paper on AI R&D automation triggering intelligence explosion — birchlse · 2026-09-29
- AI workflow flags discrepancies in 3,460 of 4,452 econ replication packages across five journals — Afinetheorem · 2026-09-29
- Schmidt Sciences hiring Fellows in Residence with $50k compute and $50k workshop budget — peterbhase · 2026-09-29