Neuroscientist pushes back: task-trained nets converge on brain-like representations that can predict primate cortex
coherence · x · 2026-09-28
coherence reposts @camhberg's rebuttal to the claim that neural networks tell us nothing about brains:
- He concedes key differences exist (substrate, neuromodulation, recurrence) and that nobody serious claims machine intelligence equals human intelligence.
- Still, he argues brains are the closest reference class for frontier AI dynamics, with no close second.
- The evidence: a growing literature showing networks trained only on tasks converge on brain-like representations—close enough to predict and even steer activity in primate and human cortex—with multiple studies cited.
More from AGI Musings
- Oxford team's 1.5M-trip Uber study finds higher take rates and less driver pay — RDBinns · 2026-09-28
- Multiverse teachers report 'horrendous stress' from AI system that monitors and scores their teaching — nordicinst · 2026-09-28
- The biggest buildout in history: data centers are industrializing intelligence — Dr_Singularity · 2026-09-28
- Writer Kate Willett: frontier AI builders can't accept they're engineers, not God — AlexTensor · 2026-09-28
- I watched 19 YouTube videos on the AI pause debate: where everyone agrees and splits — Ok_Low_5536 · 2026-09-28
- Sci-fi author David Brin releases 'Perspective on Machine Consciousness' — cccalum · 2026-09-28