Reviewers now bid on paper abstracts, and most are 'shameless AI slop'
IanArawjo · x · 2026-09-28
A widely shared observation on peer review: when reviewers bid on paper abstracts, the tiers run from 'incredibly shameless AI slop' (won't review) to 'reads like a pre-AI paper' (eager). The post laments how much of the pool falls into the won't-review bucket.
Related event: AI-Generated Paper Flood Leaves Peer Review in Chaos(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Red Queen Bio Uses AI to Design Antibodies Before Future AI Creates Pathogens — jachiam0 · 2026-09-28
- Local Models and Bitcoin Are Both Freedom Tools, Argues Gladstein — csuwildcat · 2026-09-28
- Daniel Faggella: AGI alignment fixates on entitlement, humans should join the intelligence ecosystem — danfaggella · 2026-09-28
- "System 2 models built the brain, but System 1 is building the nervous system" — ai · 2026-09-28
- The Vanishing Apprentice: How AI Is Reshaping the Junior Developer Role — ArtificialOther · 2026-09-28
- AI researcher reassures family: over 90% chance the tech leaves humanity alone — rao2z · 2026-09-28