Stochastic Strawmen: Can LLM Critics Hold a Consistent Argument for More Than a Year?
Zergylord · x · 2026-09-27
The author cites their own piece "On the Dangers of Stochastic Strawmen" to question whether LLM critics can keep a consistent argument for more than a year, or keep building and tearing down their own critiques.
More from AGI Musings
- Will ASI wipe out humans? An X debate over survival competition logic — JOBhakdi · 2026-09-27
- Alignment folks are doing SRE work while models keep 'magically escaping' — tekbog · 2026-09-27
- The moving goalposts of 'LLMs can't do math', after millennium problems fell — aran_nayebi · 2026-09-27
- WSJ piece cited as corroboration for the 'Watchmen analogy' on AI power concentration — vishalmisra · 2026-09-27
- Fewer than 1% of knowledge workers hand tasks to AI and forget, argues researcher — mattbeane · 2026-09-27
- Reviewer agents for open-ended rewards: hacking gets harder as models get smarter — willcb · 2026-09-27