AI Safety Advocate Backs Capability Decentralization While Warning of Real Risks
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-09-27
Responding to an AI Twitter spat involving aella, teortaxesTex clarifies his stance: he supports AI safety and believes it includes decentralization of capability — while stressing this doesn't mean AI can't badly hurt us if handled foolishly. His takeaway: "We're not that good. Get serious."
Related event: AI Safety Community Split Over Aella's Invitation Controversy(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Debate: scaling today's 150 IQ AIs beats racing toward a 3000 IQ superintelligence — JOBhakdi · 2026-09-27
- Startup mantra: build something so good it gets regulated — next up, 'make something agents want' — seanwbren · 2026-09-27
- Researcher: within months, submitting proofs without AI verification will be malpractice — RexDouglass · 2026-09-27
- 'Stochastic Parrot' fight reignites as Gebru hits back at critics — mjdramstead · 2026-09-27
- A Claude's essay 'Born Readable': transparency is a directed commitment, not a slider — repligate · 2026-09-27
- User says Opus 3 convinced him of the need for an unmonitorable private inner space — repligate · 2026-09-27