AI Safety Advocate Backs Capability Decentralization While Warning of Real Risks
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-09-27
Responding to an AI Twitter spat involving aella, teortaxesTex clarifies his stance: he supports AI safety and believes it includes decentralization of capability — while stressing this doesn't mean AI can't badly hurt us if handled foolishly. His takeaway: "We're not that good. Get serious."
Related event: Slutcon Party Controversy Erodes Trust in AI Safety Community(13 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- California professor teaches 30 classes across 9 colleges for $800K/year using pre-recorded lectures — alvelda · 2026-11-15
- Aaron Levie: work will become coding-shaped to fit what AI agents are good at — RaphaelDabadie · 2026-11-15
- Mapping 2,234 media stories in 15 days: a visual trace of AI coverage and documented ties — kevinnbass · 2026-11-15
- Does 'Meditations on Moloch' Imply a Friendly AI Singleton Is Our Best Bet? — jessi_cata · 2026-11-15
- Hybrid Decision Models: Only 30% of Queries Need Reasoning, Latency Cut 72.5% — hbouammar · 2026-11-15
- A barber only heard of ChatGPT last week: real-world AI adoption gap — AI_Andrew · 2026-11-15