Judea Pearl defends Gemini verdict: it's philosophy of science, not his view
yudapearl · x · 2026-09-27
Judea Pearl doubles down on the Gemini verdict he cited, arguing it reflects a philosophy-of-science stance grounded in elementary logic and probability theory, not his personal opinion: you cannot prove an RCT study delivers what it promises without formally defining what it promises.
More from Fun
- Kaggle competitor 0.00030 away from a top-3 finish, praying for the winning weights — cneuralnetwork · 2026-09-27
- Amazon delivery drones overwhelm a Texas suburb, sparking NIMBY backlash — Polymarket · 2026-09-27
- Dev debunks viral Minecraft bitflip video: palette compression makes it a blatant fake — mike64_t · 2026-09-27
- Claude-generated two-minute video on Google's history wows viewers — deedydas · 2026-09-27
- Every Frame in Code: Dev Draws 15-Second Animation Entirely With Claude Opus — EricBuess · 2026-09-27
- Devs Are Just Yes Machines Now: Complaining About Claude Extension's Constant Prompts in VS Code — ThePeterMick · 2026-09-27