Melanie Mitchell: Post-Training Like RLHF Makes Models No Longer Statistical Language Models
MelMitchell1 · x · 2026-09-27
Santa Fe Institute's Melanie Mitchell weighs into a terminology debate: people now use "LLM" loosely for any large AI system built on a pre-trained LM, which is not the sense meant in the Stochastic Parrots paper — that's her only point.
She adds that any post-training moving the model away from the general statistics of language (e.g., RLHF or RL for tool use) makes it no longer a statistical model of language in the sense of modeling the structure of human language.
Related event: Melanie Mitchell Sparks Debate: Today's Systems Are Not LLMs(31 posts)→
More from Models
- Running DeepSeek 4.1 locally on an $800 rig with a used RTX 3090 at 2-3 tok/s — LankyGuitar6528 · 2026-11-11
- Google open-sources Harness², an agent that rewrites its own setup per task — Arindam_1729 · 2026-11-11
- Dev dumps Codex desktop app over quality issues, falls back to codex-cli — tekbog · 2026-11-11
- Why do old models get dumber before launches? Lab party, says joking X post — glcst · 2026-11-11
- Grok Bot now detects hidden prompt injections, warns users and refuses to follow them — XFreeze · 2026-11-11
- Shanghai Institute Open-Sources Nex-N2.6, a 321B Multimodal Agentic Model — victormustar · 2026-11-11