"AI Safety Is Pseudoscience" Debate Hinges on OpenAI's Opaque Multi-Agent Training
basedjensen · x · 2026-09-26
doomslide's inflammatory claim that "AI Safety is fundamentally a pseudoscience" drew pushback via a more substantive quote: unless the open ecosystem can figure out how OpenAI's multi-agent training works, AI safety can't reason about the resulting agents — analogous to studying RLVR without DeepSeek's open R1. Jensen amplified the critique.
More from AGI Musings
- The more time you spend with agents, the lower your tolerance for mistakes — justalexoki · 2026-09-26
- WSJ: AI has become the biggest economic bet in US history — xiaosun86 · 2026-09-26
- Ribbonfarm's vgr turns 17 years of writing into a paid AI replica of his mind — sebpaquet · 2026-09-26
- Cardiologist on AI in healthcare: "bots fighting bots, a dystopia nobody wants" — MannyKayy · 2026-09-26
- Compute and Energy Win AI: A Bettor Doubles Down on xAI — SydSteyerhart · 2026-09-26
- Zero self-made founders: all 20 young German top-50 rich list members inherited wealth — victor_explore · 2026-09-26