Custom benchmark: 35B Qwen3.6 scores 95% vs 53% for 120B GPT-OSS on coding agent

pauliusztin · reddit · 2026-09-26

A developer building an AI agent from scratch found that Qwen3.6-35B hit 95% pass@1 on his custom coding-agent benchmark, while GPT-OSS-120B — roughly 4x larger — managed only 53%, showing generic leaderboards and model specs can't be trusted for your own use case.

Benchmark design

Key caveat: the harness was tuned specifically for Qwen3.6-35B, which explains the gap — optimizing your harness for your model matters at least as much as specs.

Cost finding: on the same workload, pay-per-token (OpenRouter, $0.18 per 1.2M tokens) beat pay-per-GPU-hour (Modal); GPU billing only makes sense if you can batch tasks and keep utilization near 100%.

Bottom line: model size and leaderboard rankings are only useful up to a point — test agents in your own use cases before trusting generic reports.

Original post →

More from coding & agent

coding & agent channel →