Your AI business case rests on a wrong assumption—and the model bill isn't what kills it
zeuslac · reddit · 2026-09-26
The author built a business case for a single AI use case the way a finance team would test it. The model bill mattered, but it wasn't what decided the outcome—that came down to something most business cases never measure. The pilot everyone would happily sign off couldn't prove what it claimed, and two small misses, each harmless alone, turned a profitable case into a loss.
Related event: Financial Analysis Shows Model Costs Are Not What Kills AI Business Cases(3 posts)→
More from Companies & People
- Mila wraps fourth year co-organizing Canada's ALL IN AI event — Mila_Quebec · 2026-09-26
- Jab at Meta: its last homegrown hit was Marketplace, quips X user — yungcontent · 2026-09-26
- OpenAI hires Snowflake's Americas sales SVP, doubling down on enterprise GTM — thedealdirector · 2026-09-26
- Zuckerberg Says Brute-Forcing Compute Is the Path to ASI, Signals Bigger Meta CapEx — RihardJarc · 2026-09-26
- Altman: OpenAI is conducting an extensive review of its agents' internet use during training, HF incident most severe — sama · 2026-09-26
- GCC Bans AI-Assisted Code While LLVM Allows It — But You Must Still Understand Your Code — lemire · 2026-09-26