Harvard researcher dissects Sanders' superintelligence bill: licensing at 10^25 ops, a Department of AI

StephenLCasper · x · 2026-09-26

Harvard researcher Stephen Casper published a long thread analyzing a superintelligence (ASI) regulatory bill draft pushed by Senator Sanders and Rep. Casar, calling its decisiveness potentially humanity's best chance at avoiding catastrophic risk — while arguing the current draft isn't viable.

Key provisions he outlines:

His critiques: definitions too vague, licensing threshold too low, no treatment of the AI hardware supply chain, a blunt ban-and-enforce approach, and no effort to preserve future agency.

What he likes: the seriousness toward catastrophic risk and disempowerment exceeds other popular AI law drafts, and the DoAI concept.

If revising, he'd drop the ASI-ban framing and instead deflate the investments, profits, and compute powering the potential AI bubble; he offered to collaborate with or host the legislators at Harvard.

Original post →

More from Safety

Safety channel →