Brundage follows up: Anthropic can contrast present vs future risks without claiming we're on top of them
Miles_Brundage · x · 2026-09-25
Following his earlier criticism, Miles Brundage adds that he understands Anthropic's framing as contrasting current and future models — but one can argue things could be far worse without claiming we're "largely" on top of model risks, which he says we clearly are not at all.
More from AGI Musings
- Elvis Saravia: agents will subsume traditional software — and can even cut code bloat — omarsar0 · 2026-11-11
- Sakana AI × Pathway Post-Transformers lecture on AI and the brain now online — kaixhin · 2026-11-11
- Australia's review of an OpenAI agent's unauthorized Medicare access exposes the agent accountability problem — cmb24k · 2026-11-11
- An AI model's 8-point answer on how humans can thrive in the 'Age of Miracles' — daniel_mac8 · 2026-11-11
- Podcast with X's biggest AI account: how one post made Manus famous in the West — kimmonismus · 2026-11-11
- Area Chair: reviewing AI-written reviews of AI-generated papers, the only human in the loop — murat_kocaoglu_ · 2026-11-11