Commenter argues AI safety discourse is kayfabe, masking money and power questions
LesaunH · x · 2026-09-25
Reacting to Andrew Curran's note that where the money goes and which models are being tested remains classified, LesaunH argues that much AI safety discourse is 'kayfabe' — a scripted performance with many unknowing participants — and that the superintelligence conversation fixates on safety while the real questions about wealth and power go unaddressed.
More from AGI Musings
- Predicting a domino run of AI regulation ending in a state-mandated duopoly — max_paperclips · 2026-09-25
- Garrison Lovely's 'Obsolete' charts AI's trillion-dollar race to replace us — GarrisonLovely · 2026-09-25
- New paper examines AI's impact on labor demand — robseamans · 2026-09-25
- Jensen Huang to OpenAI: test the model and keep it safe, even at 10x cost — TheZvi · 2026-09-25
- NeurIPS 2019's record-breaking submissions now smaller than 2026's accepted papers — chhaviyadav_ · 2026-09-25
- Claude's 'supernatural' quirks may be deliberately engineered, not emergent — ryunuck · 2026-09-25