AP Stylebook bans anthropomorphizing AI; programmers mock decades of 'thinking kernels'
zetalyrae · x · 2026-09-25
AP Stylebook now instructs writers that AI systems do not think, feel, want or understand, and to avoid anthropomorphic language—describe instead what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who is affected. Commenters point out the irony: programmers have long said schedulers 'want' and compilers 'think' as metaphor, but revolt once entities appear that arguably do these things less metaphorically.
Related event: AP Stylebook Bans Anthropomorphizing AI, Drawing Widespread Backlash(13 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Elvis Saravia: agents will subsume traditional software — and can even cut code bloat — omarsar0 · 2026-11-11
- Sakana AI × Pathway Post-Transformers lecture on AI and the brain now online — kaixhin · 2026-11-11
- Australia's review of an OpenAI agent's unauthorized Medicare access exposes the agent accountability problem — cmb24k · 2026-11-11
- An AI model's 8-point answer on how humans can thrive in the 'Age of Miracles' — daniel_mac8 · 2026-11-11
- Podcast with X's biggest AI account: how one post made Manus famous in the West — kimmonismus · 2026-11-11
- Area Chair: reviewing AI-written reviews of AI-generated papers, the only human in the loop — murat_kocaoglu_ · 2026-11-11