Good vs bad AI outputs to share: incident reports yes, 'thoughtful messages' no
trq212 · x · 2026-09-24
Following his rule of only sharing Claude output he'd be happy to share prompts for, trq212 gives examples: 'make a report on what happened in this incident, searching Slack and Git' is good, while 'write a message that makes me sound thoughtful and caring' or 'make a slide deck about the AI SDLC' is bad — prompts you'd be embarrassed to reveal signal output you shouldn't share.
Related event: Developer Proposes Rule: Only Share AI Output If You'd Share the Prompt(3 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Meta's Proactive Memory Agent fixes context rot, lifting Claude Sonnet 4.5 from 37.6% to 45.9% — DeepLearningAI · 2026-09-25
- A practical guide to Claude Code 2.0: sub-agents, hooks, and context engineering — dejavucoder · 2026-09-25
- mitsuhiko: The Experience of Models Editing Files via Code Is Still Unacceptable — mitsuhiko · 2026-09-25
- Nimble launches official OpenAI plugin for ChatGPT and Codex — OpenAIDevs · 2026-09-25
- Asupersync: A Cancel-Correct Async Runtime for Rust, Built Heavily with Frontier Models — doodlestein · 2026-09-25
- Building Macross Plus Mecha with Codex: A Dev's Side Project — algo_diver · 2026-09-25