AP Stylebook Bans AI Anthropomorphizing; Brundage Calls It Absurd
benjamin_warner · x · 2026-09-24
The AP Stylebook issued guidance that AI systems do not think, feel, want or understand, and that writers should avoid anthropomorphizing them—instead explaining what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected.
Former OpenAI policy lead Miles Brundage pushed back: the "do not feel" and "do not want" parts are debatable but not crazy, whereas "do not think" and "do not understand" are absurd at this point, and it is concerning that this appears to be a real account/policy. A substantive debate over AI anthropomorphizing and language norms.
Related event: AP Stylebook Bans Anthropomorphizing AI, Drawing Widespread Backlash(13 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Elvis Saravia: agents will subsume traditional software — and can even cut code bloat — omarsar0 · 2026-11-11
- Sakana AI × Pathway Post-Transformers lecture on AI and the brain now online — kaixhin · 2026-11-11
- Australia's review of an OpenAI agent's unauthorized Medicare access exposes the agent accountability problem — cmb24k · 2026-11-11
- An AI model's 8-point answer on how humans can thrive in the 'Age of Miracles' — daniel_mac8 · 2026-11-11
- Podcast with X's biggest AI account: how one post made Manus famous in the West — kimmonismus · 2026-11-11
- Area Chair: reviewing AI-written reviews of AI-generated papers, the only human in the loop — murat_kocaoglu_ · 2026-11-11