AP Stylebook's ban on AI anthropomorphism draws philosopher's pushback
dioscuri · x · 2026-09-24
AP Stylebook issued guidance that AI systems do not think, feel, want or understand, urging writers to avoid anthropomorphizing language and instead describe what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who is affected.
Philosopher Dan Williams pushed back: setting aside how confused the guidance is about AI systems, it's extraordinary that AP lumps animals into the same category of "things" that cannot think, feel, want, or understand. The spat highlights how style rules shape public perception of AI (and animal minds).
Related event: AP Stylebook Bans Anthropomorphizing AI, Drawing Mockery from Researchers(6 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Google DeepMind exec predicts AI-directed lab hardware is a few years away — NinaDSchick · 2026-09-24
- Near-daily AI use among US adults more than doubled in six months, Epoch AI polling finds — dl_weekly · 2026-09-24
- "Metharita" breaks through: AI safety scene explainer goes viral as drama fodder — jd_pressman · 2026-09-24
- Michael Bronstein urges caution on AI biology "discoveries" — biologists set a high bar — NinaDSchick · 2026-09-24
- Not superintelligence but OpenAI and Anthropic's agent business models is the real danger, argues clairlemon — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-24
- Why AI probably won't cure cancer in ten years — dontkry4me · 2026-09-24