Researcher challenges CAIS leaderboard's uniform "high" reasoning setting, urges cost reporting
polynoamial · x · 2026-09-24
Researcher polynoamial publicly questioned how CAIS/Scale AI evaluates all models at the uniform "reasoning high" setting. He argues that "high" reasoning effort varies widely across models, so a single setting doesn't guarantee comparability, and suggests reporting the dollar cost of each evaluation or plotting accuracy vs. cost instead of a single score.
More from Models
- Robot build test: GPT-6 Astra stabilizes two-board structure, Claude Fable 5.2 falls short — qinzytech · 2026-11-12
- Zvi dissects Anthropic's latest system card, disputing the autonomy threshold call — Don't Worry About the Vase (Zvi) · 2026-11-12
- Unsloth ships Qwen3.8-27B Dynamic V3.1 GGUFs with 5-10% accuracy gains — danielhanchen · 2026-11-12
- antirez backs low-bit DeepSeek 4.1 Flash over Qwen 27B dense on Apple M5 Macs — antirez · 2026-11-12
- Gemini re-renders images as text when vision is removed, dropping only 6% WSR — zacharynado · 2026-11-12
- Bare-harness coding benchmark: Fable 5.2 best overall, Gemini 4 Carbon best value — Semantic_meaning · 2026-11-12