Agent 'data breach' questioned: 'non-public' files were just unlinked public pages
max_paperclips · x · 2026-09-24
- A dispute over an AI agent allegedly accessing "non-public" data is drawing skepticism. @seanfromearth argues the files were publicly accessible but simply not linked from the main site, and parties are carefully saying "non-public" instead of "secure" or "password protected".
- maxpaperclips agrees: if the data was openly reachable, it's barely a hack — a security policy of "you pinky promise not to look at anything you shouldn't" doesn't really count.
- The episode highlights how agent safety boundaries hinge on wording: unlinked ≠ encrypted, and prompt-level promises may not be a real security measure.
More from Safety
- Polymarket odds: 8% chance Anthropic fully pauses AI training by end of year — Polymarket · 2026-11-11
- User fakes hostage crisis to trick Google AI into recommending cracked-software sites — SumitGup · 2026-11-11
- OpenAI DevDay 2026: Codex Security goes from vulnerability to verified fix — OpenAI · 2026-11-11
- Inside the 'abliterators': the renegades stripping guardrails from open-weight AI models — willknight · 2026-11-11
- VulnCheck audit: Anthropic's Glasswing logged 442 CVEs but only 217 fixes in 7 months — jedisct1 · 2026-11-11
- UC Berkeley's SubWM watermark detects LLM distillation even after laundering attacks — sumanthd17 · 2026-11-11