Most users treat stochastic AI as deterministic, ignoring false positives
tokenbender · x · 2026-09-24
tokenbender argues that most people were never educated on false positives/negatives, yet treat probabilistic AI systems as deterministic, using them for "aha gotcha" moments. This fallibility transcends educational background, no matter how good the product is.
More from Models
- Leak Chatter: Frontier Model 8 Months Ahead of Astra, Only 2 Months Ahead of Trend — scaling01 · 2026-09-24
- Navier-Stokes proof burned 130B output and trillions of input tokens, dwarfing top OpenAI users' few billion daily — scaling01 · 2026-09-24
- Meta Muse scores 4.88 across 40k ratings — analyst says product, distribution, price make it near-unbeatable — RihardJarc · 2026-09-24
- Audi 3D Modeling Benchmark Rerun: Only GPT-6 Astra and Opus 5.5 Are Worth Taking Seriously — kevinkern · 2026-09-24
- DIY calibration test: 200 items, score accuracy vs self-claimed 90% confidence — colinmcnamara · 2026-09-24
- Kev-9b and Decider-2b are accurate but wrongly claim 90% confidence on hard questions — colinmcnamara · 2026-09-24