Hand-edited poem still flagged 100% AI by Pangram — detector false positive debate
JFPuget · x · 2026-09-23
Responding to a case where Pangram flagged a poet's own hand-edited work as 100% AI, @francip argues that if the manipulation was done without AI, the text is still fully human-produced — making Pangram's verdict a genuine false positive, not a technicality. The exchange highlights how unreliable AI-text detectors remain.
More from Models
- Indie dev flips from $20 Pro back to $200 Gemini Ultra after two days of deep use — yihui_indie · 2026-11-11
- DeepMind says Gemini agents mathematically verified Signal's crypto protocol in 4 weeks — Polymarket · 2026-11-11
- Leak: Google's upcoming model lineup includes Hydrogen, Krypton, Helix and a video model — koltregaskes · 2026-11-11
- Rumor: OpenAI's Astra 6.2 near, spotted in Codex logs and Google Cloud quotas — haider1 · 2026-11-11
- Same prompt head-to-head: Fable 5.2 spends 3x time, 2x cost for auteur flair — iamfakhrealam · 2026-11-11
- Krafton open-sources Raon-1 nano, a 1.5B on-device LLM distilled from MoE — DimitrisPapail · 2026-11-11