Hand-edited poem still flagged 100% AI by Pangram — detector false positive debate
JFPuget · x · 2026-09-23
Responding to a case where Pangram flagged a poet's own hand-edited work as 100% AI, @francip argues that if the manipulation was done without AI, the text is still fully human-produced — making Pangram's verdict a genuine false positive, not a technicality. The exchange highlights how unreliable AI-text detectors remain.
Related event: 1967 Poem Flagged as 100% AI by Pangram Detector(2 posts)→
More from Models
- NVIDIA open-sources Nemotron 3 Diarization to fix voice agents' speaker-blindness — andimarafioti · 2026-09-23
- NVIDIA releases Nemotron 3 Diarization model handling up to 8 overlapping speakers with 100M params — NVIDIAAI · 2026-09-23
- Dev slams Anthropic's Opus 5.5 safety checks for flagging basic code reviews — evilsocket · 2026-09-23
- Deep conversations with frontier models turn into incomprehensible AI-to-AI jargon, observer warns — erikphoel · 2026-09-23
- Andrew Carr: Opus 5.5 may be the first model that's a bit creative — andrew_n_carr · 2026-09-23
- Anthropic launches Life Sciences Verification Program to gate Opus 5.5 bio access — _sholtodouglas · 2026-09-23