Perplexity staffer rebuts prestige argument for delaying AI proof release
panickssery · x · 2026-09-23
Perplexity employee panickssery responded on X to a common counterargument about releasing a proof: that someone else will write the explainer and take the prestige (or that no one will, for the same reason). He argued this is an internal prestige-allocation matter, not a valid reason to delay release, and then asked Grok which mathematicians might sign a related letter.
More from Fun
- LOTR 'Fellowship of the Muscles': AI Video Turns the Fellowship Into Bodybuilders — iquizuanswer · 2026-09-23
- Opus 5.5 one-shots an entire deck builder, and onlookers are stunned by its taste — TAbrodi · 2026-09-23
- Critic calls Optimus walking video fake AI-generated, sparking drama — TechPreacher · 2026-09-23
- Making a video of OpenAI solving Navier-Stokes with Claude Opus 5.5 — iamfakhrealam · 2026-09-23
- Leaked Astra Reasoning Skips Spaces, Apparently to Save Tokens — Substantial-Dog-6713 · 2026-09-23
- If your writing benchmark is judged by an LLM, it's not a writing benchmark — charles_irl · 2026-09-23