Andy Masley on the EA insects debate: no trading human welfare for bug welfare
AndyMasley · x · 2026-09-23
EA-adjacent writer Andy Masley weighs in on the insect-consciousness discourse: he takes seriously that insects may feel pain that "matters," but argues wild-animal suffering is too intractable and dangerous to act on. He firmly sides with humanity — any principle trading human welfare for bugs, taken consistently, would imply ending civilization. He adds that EA is a simple algorithm without built-in guardrails; guardrails must come from the social scenes around the ideas.
Related event: EA's "Insects Matter More Than People" Essay Sparks Trust Crisis(10 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI, Anthropic and DeepMind job posts signal PMs must write evals and code — aakashgupta · 2026-11-12
- PowerShell creator Jeffrey Snover at Ignite: AI revolution is an extinction event for those who don't adapt — dfinke · 2026-11-12
- Worst AI use: signaling you don't care about things you should — Afinetheorem · 2026-11-12
- Stanford HAI blueprint: 56 US agencies report 3,611 AI use cases, evaluation lags — StanfordHAI · 2026-11-12
- Fleuret amplifies debate: AI can't slash wet-lab experiments in unmapped biology — francoisfleuret · 2026-11-12
- Recursive bets on open-endedness: agents running massive parallel experiments like scientist communities — agihouse_org · 2026-11-12