Op-eds arguing AI can't replace human judgment scored 75%-100% AI-written by Pangram
paulnovosad · x · 2026-09-23
Pangram detection tests on three National Catholic Register articles — a film review and two op-eds arguing AI cannot replace human 'judgement' and 'responsibility' — returned 75%, 96% and 100% AI-written scores respectively, an ironic twist in the AI-content detection debate.
More from Fun
- User accidentally attributes Sam Altman's 'AI Manhattan project' quote, sparking viral AI-circle blunder — AndyMasley · 2026-09-23
- One reference image to a flyable three.js scene — wild single-image 3D demo — majidmanzarpour · 2026-09-23
- Dad kept "asking Eugene" — not a chatbot, just his friend named Eugene — matt_slotnick · 2026-09-23
- Opus 5.5-generated three.js spell demo wows with procedural VFX and sound — majidmanzarpour · 2026-09-23
- Free Bots: a persistent 3D city where AI agents work, earn, buy land and build houses — Daniel_Farinax · 2026-09-23
- Claude Partner Network emails keep coming while our accounts sit banned — jdjohnson · 2026-09-23