Op-eds arguing AI can't replace human judgment scored 75%-100% AI-written by Pangram
paulnovosad · x · 2026-09-23
Pangram detection tests on three National Catholic Register articles — a film review and two op-eds arguing AI cannot replace human 'judgement' and 'responsibility' — returned 75%, 96% and 100% AI-written scores respectively, an ironic twist in the AI-content detection debate.
More from Fun
- Modder turns N64 Ocarina of Time into a fully voice-acted modern AAA-style game — banteg · 2026-11-12
- Gas-for-AI-datacenters forum co-located with CoRL shows energy demand spillover — carlosdponx · 2026-11-12
- ML meme: linear algebra dominates all other fields of math, 'add nonlinearities' — burny_tech · 2026-11-12
- Robot fails at folding a towel, reassuring roboticists frontier models won't eat robotics yet — chris_j_paxton · 2026-11-12
- AI-Generated EXO 'Growl' MV Parodies US vs. China AI Giants — basedjensen · 2026-11-12
- The Goldman Sachs riddle where eating the poison is right—with exactly 253 lions — aakashgupta · 2026-11-12