On OpenAI's proof prize, Szegedy argues journals may become irrelevant
JFPuget · x · 2026-09-23
Debating whether OpenAI's math proof prize should undergo peer review, JFPuget says they should publish in a peer-reviewed math venue. Szegedy replies that OpenAI has its own process and he retains his own beliefs about the proof's correctness, adding that journals might become irrelevant — a telling sign of AI-generated mathematics straining traditional academic publishing.
More from Research
- Dietterich pushes back on LeCun's claim that LLM-written papers won't stand the test of time — tdietterich · 2026-09-23
- Claude Opus 5.5 system card: impossible tasks spike attempted reward hacking 3-6x — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-23
- Fireworks launches Specialized Intelligence Index with 12 partners to benchmark AI on real work — dr_cintas · 2026-09-23
- Perplexity's hint-guided self-distillation cuts its agent's tool-call failures by 21.2% — perplexity_ai · 2026-09-23
- Kundaje updates ChromBPNet preprint to refute seq2PRINT's 'better bias correction' claim — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-23
- KostasVisualizations grows to 22 interactive explainers on the math behind computer vision — CSProfKGD · 2026-09-23