Dev disappointed by Grok 4.7: 3D and 2D builds all failed, 'needs work to match Opus 4.6'
prasenx · x · 2026-09-22
Developer prasenx spent 8 hours testing Grok 4.7 and came away disappointed: 3D attempts (including with skill files) all failed, switching to 2D didn't help, and three.js tasks fared especially poorly. He says it's fine as a daily driver but 'needs a lot of upgrades to match at least Opus 4.6' — a step back from Grok 4.5/4.6, which he found great for the price.
More from coding & agent
- dotey's 4-step AI project workflow: PoC first, Claude Design, then lean MVP — dotey · 2026-09-22
- Musk shows Grok 4.7 doing real engineering at Tesla, shipping FSD features overnight — elonmusk · 2026-09-22
- Virtual Biotech teardown: 6 design decisions behind Science's 37,000-agent drug company — bravo_abad · 2026-09-22
- Half of 25 PM Job Openings Ask for Evals Experience; Ramp, Shopify, Harvey, Cursor Share ROI Data — lennysan · 2026-09-22
- 37,000-agent virtual drug company: the engineering behind Virtual Biotech — bravo_abad · 2026-09-22
- LinearSolveBench debuts: testing if AI can write fast C solvers for sparse linear systems — hgarud · 2026-09-22