banteg sparks debate: pure-math AI research is 'math psychosis' divorced from reality
banteg · x · 2026-09-22
- Developer banteg argues much of current AI-adjacent math research is pure "math psychosis": rabbit-hole puzzles with no plausible real-world applications — "mathematicians are mad their sudoku is being taken away."
- A quoted reply pushes back philosophically: proofs and symbols that never check conclusions against reality's frictions are indistinguishable from fantasy — "proofs must eventually answer to measurement, or they're simply poems with numbers."
- The core claim: internal coherence without external correspondence just means consistency with one's own hopes; numbers are either compressions of reality or compressions of nothing.
More from AGI Musings
- Prediction: hospitals will keep their own tested open-model formularies in two years — MaziyarPanahi · 2026-11-12
- Packy revives Qwest CEO's 1998 'no bandwidth glut' quote for the AI oversupply debate — prestonpesek · 2026-11-12
- Stanford's James Zou joins The Economist podcast on AI agents in science — anshulkundaje · 2026-11-12
- a16z maps the B2A economy: AI agents are now most of web traffic and soon its buyers — venturetwins · 2026-11-12
- Jason: Anthropic is rebuilding every SaaS product into Claude—free for life — smtabatabaie · 2026-11-12
- Fleuret: if AI designs drugs as fast as it makes dumb videos, regulation will buckle — francoisfleuret · 2026-11-12