Gebru and Bender: this summer's AI breakthrough hype is mostly marketing
MIT Tech Review AI · rss · 2026-09-22
Timnit Gebru (DAIR) and Emily Bender (UW) dissect this summer's AI hype cycle in MIT Tech Review:
- Hacking incidents reframed: cybersecurity experts say the "rogue model" stories were really OpenAI negligence of basic security practices — the framing helps companies dodge accountability.
- Math breakthroughs challenged: mathematicians found OpenAI's Astra claims far less novel than advertised, accusing the company of research misconduct; NYU's Tristan Buckmaster alleged OpenAI stole others' work.
- Why math and coding? Both sell the "all-knowing machine" narrative and are cheap to train on since outputs are automatically verifiable.
- Ideological critique: "incipient superintelligence" claims rest on transhumanist ideology, not science, while real harms — data centers' climate impact, asthma, electricity bills, water use — get dismissed as "distractions."
- The authors echo hundreds of mathematicians urging policymakers to consult independent experts rather than press releases.
More from AGI Musings
- Researcher: vibe-science won't cut it — discipline and rigor matter more than ever — divy93t · 2026-09-23
- Carnegie China launches longitudinal study tracking the global AI talent race — kevinsxu · 2026-09-23
- Stanford releases 'AI in 2026' soup-to-nuts overview of the field — CCgong · 2026-09-23
- AI Is a Compression of Millions of Years of Brain Evolution, Not an Industrial Revolution — sudoraohacker · 2026-09-23
- DeepMind Co-founder Shane Legg: My 2008 PhD Thesis Was Well Ahead of Its Time — ShaneLegg · 2026-09-23
- Vals AI RSI Index: Opus 5.5 Beats Human Baseline on One of Five Tasks, Pulling RSI Estimate to July 2027 — ResultBackground2450 · 2026-09-23