ICML 2027 chair asks publicly how to handle AI slop and submission explosion
roydanroy · x · 2026-09-22
Andrew Gordon Wilson, Program Chair for ICML 2027, is publicly soliciting ideas: how to manage the explosion of AI-generated low-quality submissions and runaway submission growth, improve reviewing, incentivize high-quality creative work, and cut bureaucracy. One reply mocks the recurring "limit to two submissions per author" suggestion as old-school. It reflects ongoing debate over peer-review reform in the AI conference ecosystem.
More from AGI Musings
- Fermi paradox twist: advanced civilizations may go digital after developing AI — VraserX · 2026-11-12
- Mark Cuban: AI could make healthcare costs 'drop like a rock' — alvelda · 2026-11-12
- Researcher's paradox: if AI makes everyone unemployed, who pays for tokens? — prajdabre · 2026-11-12
- Dear ImGui Creator ocornut: AI Empowers Mediocre Makers to Produce More Mediocrity, Faster — rms80 · 2026-11-12
- PauseAI vs Andy Masley: does superintelligent AI risk require outlandish beliefs? — birchlse · 2026-11-12
- Big AI conflates scale with innovation as voters reject data center ballot measures — DavidLinthicum · 2026-11-12