Insects-matter-more-than-humans debate sparks 'moral realism fallacy' rejoinder
mjdramstead · x · 2026-09-22
The EA community is sparring over Bentham's Bulldog's argument that insects may morally outweigh humans. @aryehazan pushes back: those demanding the flaw be exposed are committing the "moral realism fallacy." Unlike physics — where absurd conclusions like Dirac's positron deserve serious pursuit — a moral argument that yields a repugnant conclusion only invalidates its own premises.
Related event: EA's "Insects Matter More Than People" Essay Sparks Trust Crisis(10 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI, Anthropic and DeepMind job posts signal PMs must write evals and code — aakashgupta · 2026-11-12
- PowerShell creator Jeffrey Snover at Ignite: AI revolution is an extinction event for those who don't adapt — dfinke · 2026-11-12
- Worst AI use: signaling you don't care about things you should — Afinetheorem · 2026-11-12
- Stanford HAI blueprint: 56 US agencies report 3,611 AI use cases, evaluation lags — StanfordHAI · 2026-11-12
- Fleuret amplifies debate: AI can't slash wet-lab experiments in unmapped biology — francoisfleuret · 2026-11-12
- Recursive bets on open-endedness: agents running massive parallel experiments like scientist communities — agihouse_org · 2026-11-12