EEBench comparison sparks debate: Grok 4.7 called out vs Astra's speed and cost
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-09-22
A reposted take on Grok 4.7's performance on the electronics-design benchmark EEBench: the author claims EEBench outputs built with Atopile are "unreviewable slop," while a real model should produce usable schematics with tools like Backplane — and that Astra "brutally mogs" every other model on time and cost per task. A third-party, unverified comparison claim.
More from Models
- Jev service suspends signups after overflowing; user to push another billion tokens today — MaziyarPanahi · 2026-09-22
- Jev excels at graduate-level knowledge, Python function choosing, tool calling and model routing — multimodalart · 2026-09-22
- Jev benchmark results: strong at tool calling and automation, weak at reasoning and retrieval — multimodalart · 2026-09-22
- Limite ships 1B math model trained on under 300B tokens — tensorqt · 2026-09-22
- Best open LLM reportedly cost just $3.5M to post-train — Kyrannio · 2026-09-22
- 37 benchmarks, 130K decisions per model: jev excels at tools and automation — multimodalart · 2026-09-22