Physicist pushes back on AI math proof criticism: strategy allowed by Clay criteria
skdh · x · 2026-09-22
Replying to Gary Marcus, Sabine Hossenfelder argues the strategy used in the contested AI math proof is explicitly allowed by the Clay criteria, and that mathematicians now saying "it's not what we meant" is disingenuous.
Related event: OpenAI's Navier-Stokes Claim Draws Widespread Backlash from Mathematicians(16 posts)→
More from Fun
- 50+ NeurIPS 2025 papers found containing AI hallucinations that slipped past peer review — CSProfKGD · 2026-11-12
- 'Just Train on Test': The Benchmark-Gaming Joke AI Circles Keep Making — pranjalssh · 2026-11-12
- The 2026 Developer Slack: 'My Claude Says to Tell Your Claude It Is Sorry' — jmugan · 2026-11-12
- Show HN: Papers, Please remake casts you as a YC partner vetting startups — bolau · 2026-11-12
- Meme: "AIs are mysterious aliens we grow" vs "just switch to a different ontology" — sebkrier · 2026-11-12
- Gemini 4 Carbon builds a full 3D aquarium in Blender and Three.js in ~6 hours — sunjiao123sun_ · 2026-11-12