Rationalist argues distance-blind utilitarian math is the wrong frame for animal ethics
tracewoodgrains · x · 2026-09-22
Responding to "how many animals equal one human life," tracewoodgrains argues the question presupposes the wrong frame: duties to self, family, community, nation, humanity and the world are nested, with nearer duties taking priority. Treating animals well matters, but god's-eye distance-blind utilitarian arithmetic is fundamentally the wrong tool. The exchange is part of the EA-circle feud sparked by Bentham's Bulldog's "people matter less than insects" piece.
Related event: EA Community Erupts Over 'Insects Matter More Than Humans' Essay(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Whoever owns mobile-first consumer chat will win agentic commerce, argues founder — santoshpanda · 2026-09-22
- The great ikeafication of intellectual labor is coming — analisereal · 2026-09-22
- Pew: 34 of 37 countries expect AI to shrink jobs; US youth concern jumps to 55% — shashib · 2026-09-22
- Physics labs shun GitHub and Claude Code, handwrite CUDA kernels — vxnuaj · 2026-09-22
- "Which lab builds ASI?" Wrong question — everyone will, like chat-with-PDF — willcb · 2026-09-22
- Will AI Bring Peace or More Aggression? A Fukuyama-Inspired Worry About Thymos — wfithian · 2026-09-22