Every AI control attempt is a tighter cage, argues Nina Miolane
ninamiolane · x · 2026-09-21
Nina Miolane argues that every attempt to control AI since the sandbox-escape incident has been a tighter cage: stricter isolation, a kill switch, or a second AI watching the first. These measures are worth taking, but they expose that we cannot yet predict what AI will do — we're only preparing to react. It's part of her Science of Intelligence discussion series.
More from AGI Musings
- Zvi: the AI-written essay is far worse than if the author had written it himself — TheZvi · 2026-09-21
- The hidden cost of bundling: specialized models are displacing frontier LLMs — multiply_matrix · 2026-09-21
- New reading group revisits 2015-era LessWrong classics to audit old AI predictions against 2026 reality — voooooogel · 2026-09-21
- Prediction: all mainstream software will be formally verified by 2030 — sytelus · 2026-09-21
- Overlapping-generation long-lived agent societies could build on prior work toward breakthroughs — DimitrisPapail · 2026-09-21
- Mel Mitchell: 'superintelligence' is as chimerical as AGI, yet regulation proposals hinge on it — MelMitchell1 · 2026-09-21