Nina Miolane argues AI safety needs 'engineering laws': predictive math for intelligence
ninamiolane · x · 2026-09-21
Nina Miolane, collaborating with geometric intelligence, neurreps and several UCSB groups, draws an analogy to civil engineering: we keep bridges standing not by watching them but by understanding loads and computing limits in advance — safety follows understanding. She argues we can write predictive mathematical laws for intelligence, and announces a collaboration with UCSB researchers on this research direction.
Related event: Nina Miolane proposes predictive "bridge laws" for AI safety(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Zvi: the AI-written essay is far worse than if the author had written it himself — TheZvi · 2026-09-21
- The hidden cost of bundling: specialized models are displacing frontier LLMs — multiply_matrix · 2026-09-21
- New reading group revisits 2015-era LessWrong classics to audit old AI predictions against 2026 reality — voooooogel · 2026-09-21
- Prediction: all mainstream software will be formally verified by 2030 — sytelus · 2026-09-21
- Overlapping-generation long-lived agent societies could build on prior work toward breakthroughs — DimitrisPapail · 2026-09-21
- Mel Mitchell: 'superintelligence' is as chimerical as AGI, yet regulation proposals hinge on it — MelMitchell1 · 2026-09-21