Anil Seth weighs in on the LLM 'pain' paper fueling the AI welfare debate
anilkseth · x · 2026-09-21
Consciousness researcher Anil Seth shared a balanced, nuanced analysis of the widely discussed preprint on 'pain representation' in LLMs. The paper has drawn heavy attention as supposed evidence for AI welfare claims, and Seth — while respecting the authors — pointed to an analysis examining what it actually implies for the AI welfare debate.
More from AGI Musings
- PowerShell creator Jeffrey Snover at Ignite: AI revolution is an extinction event for those who don't adapt — dfinke · 2026-11-12
- Worst AI use: signaling you don't care about things you should — Afinetheorem · 2026-11-12
- Stanford HAI blueprint: 56 US agencies report 3,611 AI use cases, evaluation lags — StanfordHAI · 2026-11-12
- Fleuret amplifies debate: AI can't slash wet-lab experiments in unmapped biology — francoisfleuret · 2026-11-12
- Recursive bets on open-endedness: agents running massive parallel experiments like scientist communities — agihouse_org · 2026-11-12
- Recursive's Tim Shi maps recursive self-improvement: from learning data to discovering architectures — agihouse_org · 2026-11-12