AI Debate: Is Everything You Disagree With Now 'Slop'?
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-09-21
@teortaxesTex responds to @ctjlewis's objection: "slop" here means a System-1, low-effort argument or intentional sandbagging, and he has no doubt the other person wrote it themselves.
He adds that doomers don't intend to outsmart ASI — their whole thesis is that they can't, so they focus on preventing its emergence in the first place.
More from AGI Musings
- What AI means for mathematicians: seven predictions extrapolated from software — cgarciae88 · 2026-09-21
- Three emergences in AI: scaling, inference-time scaling, and multi-agent scaling — sqcai · 2026-09-21
- Being against AI use is like being against ambition, argues developer — AaronBergman18 · 2026-09-21
- Prove2Me: Claude agents wrote 13M lines of Lean in 11 days to formalize Fermat's Last Theorem — liuzhuang1234 · 2026-09-21
- EA Called a Distinctive Experiment in High-Agency Applied Philosophy with Few Guardrails — jessi_cata · 2026-09-21
- Meta Muse pitch revives the question: will personal AI agents get real permission controls or just one big Allow button? — yi111 · 2026-09-21