Researcher: LLMs write convincing related work, but convincing isn't comprehensive
lucacarlone1 · x · 2026-09-21
Replying to a debate on LLMs in research, the author argues modern LLMs still can't craft related-work sections at an expert level: their literature reviews read convincingly, but convincing is not the same as comprehensive — a key gap in real scientific writing.
Related event: LLMs Can Write Papers but Not Expert-Level Related Work, Researchers Say(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Codex computer use tested: Astra works while Luna and Sol fail on Plus plan — FamilyNP · 2026-09-21
- service_tier=fast rejected on ChatGPT subscription, API-only parameter confirmed — TrickyPlastic · 2026-09-21
- Chinese open-source labs explode on OpenRouter: Moonshot +2425%, Z.ai +1925%, DeepSeek +1000% — FinanceYF5 · 2026-09-21
- Yacine: coding LLMs produce 'total complex garbage' — I still read every line — yacineMTB · 2026-09-21
- OpenAI's secret technique for upcoming Astra model sparks security concerns — keviv9 · 2026-09-21
- Jev + graphical models: zero-shot probabilistic factors could reshape reasoning systems — fdellaert · 2026-09-21